Reviews for NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite by Giorgio Maone
281 reviews
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13519535, 7 years agoThank you for all the work you put into your excellent add on.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Dan Theman, 7 years agoThank you for your continued development efforts. I hope you can return NoScript to it's former glory, despite the massive changes forced upon us all by Mozilla. I do miss the old interface, especially the simple "Temporarily Allow All Scripts" button.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Jackson Alley, 7 years agoAppreciate the work to update this for Quantum. Working well most of the time but seems to have issues with piecemeal enabled scripts for a site with inter-dependencies. ESPN is good example.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13391222, 7 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 12210558, 7 years agoI put 4 stars to encourage the developer, but I don't understand how it works. I can't find the options with the whitelist, the embeddings and the appearance. I don't even understand how to temporary allow some scripts in one click like before. I downgrade in Firefox 56 and I'll wait for a better version.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13468636, 7 years agoIt's not as good as the original YET, but at least he put something out there so we're not browsing totally naked.
Interface not as friendly, block scripts well, but hard to fine tune like before.
A good start.
So thanks Giorgio and please keep working on that better version we all really want. Don't make us wait too long. - Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13515663, 7 years agoNice new interface but very confusing. You gonna get a lot of complains about it.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Prateek Shukla, 7 years agoThanks for bringing the temporary allow all & revoke options. Please continue going and make the WE version as good and power as the normal version.
One question - Clicking the default option show that scripts are marked for sites to load, only objects are unmarked. Is this an UI error? - Rated 4 out of 5by Rykum, 7 years agoUpdating my review, now it's works under private tab. UI still needs some work but now it is more clear.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13512679, 7 years agoThanks! Works for me so far. One thing I found a bit tricky is that if one allows a script from a non-https site but without also allowing non-https from the site by clicking on the padlock, then reloading will show the site as "Default", i.e. most of the time as blocked. So it seems as if the allowing of the site was not remembered by no script. I think it would be better to show the site as allowed as one has chosen before since the padlock will give you the further information that it does only allow non-https.
I have seen lots of people saying that no script does not save allowed sites. So far for me the workaround was always to unlock the padlock as well. - Rated 4 out of 5by GringoTM, 7 years agoOttima Estensione fa quello che dice, purchè si capisca come lavora e la si configuri correttamente.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13512395, 7 years agoBisogna un po' abituarsi alla nuova interfaccia. Come al solito la pazienza degli utenti non e' un gran che "tutto e subito" imparate ad usarlo e controllate se funziona correttamente a me funziona egregiamente e mi sono gia abituato al nuovo look.
A una cosa dato che e' gratuito se non vi comoda cambiate pure componente aggiuntivo credo che Giorgio sopravvivera'.
TNX. - Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 12674645, 7 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13508328, 7 years agoI am still on FF 56 and generally happy with NoScript. After checking the FF57 status and reading what others wrote I felt compelled to do two things. First, I sent a complaint to Mozilla directly - not just about NoScript, but the whole debacle that the move to webextenions has become. They knew this would happen and let the train wreck continue any way.
Second, I am really disappointed at the vitriol directed at this developer. Most, if not all, of the blame is with Mozilla and that is where you should be directing your anger. Things that could be done pre 57 are no longer either a) allowed or b) possible or c) both.
I don't doubt that he is disappointed and angry too. One of the, if not the, most poplular extensions for years, and now kicked to the curb through little fault of his own. I'm sure he will continue to try to make it better but what is 'better' in 57+ will not ever be the same as the older versions. - Rated 4 out of 5by Reindl Harald, 7 years agothe android version don't block anything on FF57 and the UI on the desktop has ugly scrollbars here
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13507805, 7 years agoThe old version was amazing, truly a power user's addon. The new version... well I understand that you had to rush a complete redesign and rewrite... but it's too bad that it lost a lot of functionality. On the up-side, I do like the new interface.
In particular I'd like to point out that the addon does not work in Private Browsing mode. Would it be possible to add back the Temporary Permissions feature and allow people to "Temporarily Allow" URL's for the duration of Private Browsing sessions? - Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13507030, 7 years agoActually a 5*, it might be language related but in germany the translations are way to long for the new interface (Words don't fit in the reserved space).
Sadly it looks really bad.
For the other stuff I like the uMatrix like way to control what gets loaded.
Also, even thought I need to look how it works somewhere, that we got some https contol looks promising. - Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13505686, 7 years agoIt's not as functional as the original, and it took a while to figure out how to temporarily allow a script. You have to click twice on the trusted icon. The bottom line is it still works.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13505627, 7 years ago1). As a regular NoScript user unfamiliar with code/script-related stuff, I must say this update is less UN-intuitive than the former and a bit more straightforward —still not a marvel in signage, indeed, but it never was, and seems it plays its role.
2). Mr. Maone is not obliged to respond to rude demands for his free, voluntary add-on. Those childish users calling us "bootlickers" hopefully will go away after another "better" (if possible) add-on, or even better, come with an improved one themselves. - Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13505104, 7 years agoI'm really glad NoScript made it to Quantum so quickly and the people who complain about missing features probably don't realize that this is a complete rewrite of an extension that has had the chance to mature for many, many years. Comparing the two is completely unfair and I really appreciate the many, many hours of spare time that has been put into this. I can see the UI could use some improvements, though. I would be very happy to lend you a hand with that if you want/need it (I work as a lead front-end developer), so let me know if you would like to take me up on that offer.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Jeff, 7 years agoThe previous version was perfectly fine........... Now you broke it with your latest update. No temporary permissions like the previous version.... Disabled until you fix it.
Update: I did not know that Firefox made a update causing Noscript to not work causing the dev to make a quick patch which lacked a lot of things that we liked. I'm adding back some stars for effort to push out a add-on so quickly after an update. Refinements are needed as the current add-on does not work as before. But I'm still going to disable it for the time being as its too confusing to use. Will check back daily to see if a new update is available and then update it accordingly.
10.1.2 update: I take it back..... In a mere 4 days you managed to almost rewrite a new add-on with the same use as v5... Well done man... Well done. - Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 12676215, 7 years ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Krzysztof113, 7 years agoOk. Good enough.
Sites presentation is clearer and more readable now.
Missing the temporary options and allowing all. - Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13268901, 7 years agoAs always great web extension. Issue is I am android FF 57 mobile browser and XSS won't keep itself checked. Once I leave the browser and come back it is unchecked again. With the old NS that and the other security settings like anti click jacking etc... stayed checked. Other than that I am getting use to this new look and settings. Thanks.
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 13503104, 7 years agoThe new design for granting / declining permissions for a script is a bit clumsy.